<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>/Film - Latest Comments in Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://slashfilm.disqus.com/</link><description>Movie news blog</description><atom:link href="https://slashfilm.disqus.com/why_the_dark_knight_will_beat_titanic/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:21:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It won't beat Titanic even with a rerelease. Most rereleases only gross an extra $20-50 million and TDK will finish at $532 million, $69 million shy of even tying Titanic. Even if it did hypothically beat out Titanic, a rerelease technically doesn't count because Titanic was never rereleased. Star Wars original gross was only $288 million before being rereleased 4 times. Titanic is one of those special movies that should never be beaten in my opinion&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">movieman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:21:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DARK has just pretty much fucked the titanic in its ass. and i agree with everything he says, the dark knight is simply the better of the 2 because of the reasons above&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 14:26:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Dark Knight wasn't THAT great a movie, and neither was Titanic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bulgarian solicitor</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:00:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257379</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yay!  Someone with intelligence!  Amen to Knight!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Errol</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:46:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257378</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Two different era's.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this digital age where we can download whatever we want.  In this age of piracy and a horrible economy; it is amazing that The Dark Knight has down what it's done.  Whether people want to admit it or not, it redefined it's genre and was brilliant piece of filmmaking.  It doesn't have to beat Titanic because it's already placed it's own stamp on history.  The Dark Knight is the greatest comic-book movie/superhero movie of all time.  It's one of the greatest sequels of all time, and it's one of the best examples of film-making to come out in years; especially for a high level blockbuster.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In regards to Titanic; it was a phenomenon.  It was one that I never got, but nonetheless it was.  Now there's a reason why.  Titanic had NO competition during it's run.  It was the movie to see for 9 months.  These days a movie will be lucky to make it to 5 months.  The VHS didn't come out for months.  The movie market is completely different.  Studio's set up their pictures to make money VERY fast; hence why it's normal to have movie's drop 50 percent on their second weekend.  Now everyone wants to use inflation against The Dark Knight.  I'm going to use it against Titanic.  If Titanic was released today, there is absolutely, positively NO WAY it would reach the numbers it did.  It would at most make 400 million.  Why?  A major blockbuster would have come out 2 weeks later, cutting it's legs in half, talking away the attention.  Regardless it did what it did in its time, just like TDK did what it did in its (domestically).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Knight</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:19:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257377</link><description>&lt;p&gt;errrol,  how can we take what you say seriously when you can't even get the facts straight? titanic came out in december of 1997. it made most of all of it's money though in the winter of 1998. it never even came out in 1996. which isn't hard to find out if you do a google search. but well....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gotta let this hen out</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:57:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257376</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What difference does it make which movie's #1? Personally, I loved both movies and comparing them based on how much money they made at the box office is ridiculous especially since they're completely different GENRES. Whether or not TDK becomes #1 at a later date doesn't make a difference, especially since enjoying the film is more important than the tag lines that come along with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:51:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257375</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If TDK is re-released in theaters at a later date and beats Titanics' record, then that record-in my eyes and the eyes of those with knowledge of the film industry-comes with an asterisk. The headline will read "TDK IS THE NO.1 BOX OFFICE HIT OF ALL TIME, BUT WAIT, IT NEEDED A RE-RELEASE TO DO IT"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jarred</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:37:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257374</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Movie ticket prices are nearly 2x more expensive now compared to over a decade ago when Titanic was released.  With that said, Titanic is not the money maker movie of all time. There are few older movies that tops Titanic with inflation differences.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Common sense will tell u that Dark Knight is nowhere near what Titanic accumulated.  Now with that in mind, Dark Knight's 500+ million would only equal to 250+ million if it was release a decade ago, hence the inflation. Now could you really compare? Come on, this topic should not even be here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">10inches</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:55:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ Errol&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;since you won't respond to anymore of these than sit back and listen to this. get over yourself! the dark knight had its share of flaws too. the ending was subpar, the movie was long, and two face really never got his chance to shine. while the dark knight was a good movie, it is far from top 100. so stop posting crap trying to make yourself sound so much better than everyone else.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:50:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about we all talk about something besides the dark knight? It's getting old, real fast.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:23:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Then cite it.  Don't take credit for something that you didn't originally say.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Iron Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:01:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257370</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Get over yourself, Errol. TDK was a decent movie, but it was FAR from the best of all time. Also, critics and reviewers are the same thing. They're paid to offer mindless opinions to those too lazy to think for themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Goobity</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:34:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257369</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh and anyone who wants to respond with their little I'll get you with the last word comments, feel free because I'm not going back and forth with this all day every day, I tried to make you see the truth, but if you'd rather just argue with your stupid little remarks then go ahead.  I won't respond to any more of these.  I would like to say for one last final word: please don't use rotten tomatoes.....for anything.  There's a difference between a critic and a reviewer; a reviewer says they liked/disliked the movie, while a critic actually talks about what really made it bad or good based on issues that go beyond opinion and become fact.  Rotten tomatoes is full of reviewers spouting their opinions and getting paid for it, as opposed to the critics who actually deserve it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Errol</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:37:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What itsjustsomerandomguy said was the truth and I want people to hear it, jackass.  Titanic was a fluke in the sense that it's crazy how it got people to see it since all in all it was at best a decent movie!  The story was overall shaky, the acting was beyond excellent, the graphics were amazing, but editing, directing, and other technical aspects were sub par.  Idiots.  Oh and inflation should not count for anything because back in 96 when Titanic came out there was practically no internet, DVD's were not even on the market yet, so it's not fair with all the pirating and technology and other things that people have to do to count inflation in anything, it was a different time back then, so that is why the smart people do not use inflation as an actual count.  Different times, different prices, and different technology, it is simply unfair to even consider inflation # of tickets sold, etc.  There's a reason why people go by the standards they go by.  And DK is one of the top 20 best films of all time and if you wanna argue it, then whatever because when AFI comes out with their new top 100 in 2018, I'll be right and you guys will be jackasses. the directing, editing, acting, writing, cinematography, lighting, etc was all perfect and WILL change future films.  It was a film that did what no one thought a comic film could possibly do, and that is why it is that good, because when people ask what it is, you say it's a crime drama, not a comic book movie.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Errol</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:26:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257367</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This entire argument is completely void because nobody seems to adjust for inflation.  If you do that TDK barely cracks the top thirty of all time and Gone with the Wind is the true box office champ.  I'm tired of everyone going around saying that TDK could beat Titanic and as much as I would like to see that its not going to happen if you look at the number of tickets that were sold and not how much the tickets cost.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScanCase</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:18:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257366</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lol Cap,,,,&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">790</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:15:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257365</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ Mayroth: Doubt it. I'm betting WB will be producing more than enough copies to go around...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also...do some of you folks actually base your enjoyment of a film on it's BO and internet blog reviews?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dude 1: "Man, that movie kicked ass!"&lt;br&gt;Dude 2: "Yes,  but it only grossed $10 million over it's budget, and Rotten Tomatoes gave it a bad review, so I guess I didn't like it"&lt;br&gt;Dude 1: "Yeah me neither..."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Goobity</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:42:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What difference does it make if it beats titantic there are so many factors involved in holding that top position that it doesn't even mean the top is the best movie&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Batman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:38:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257363</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since absolutely NOBODY else has said it... the author of this article has a great point and it's absolutely valid. For better or worse, TDK will be #1 within the next five years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IMAX usually lets their films run for years, and the unprecedented popularity of TDK in IMAX will only ensure that run will continue long after the DVD comes out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good article&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Danny</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:05:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Releasing the dvd the holiday season is actually a pretty good idea. I mean in a matter or like, five weeks, TDK has already made it to the #2 spot, just imagine TDK dvd around christmas. If your wanting it, go get it the second it is released on dvd, or else you'll never find it. TDK will be like a Tickle Me Elmo. Once it comes out, you'll NEVER see it again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mayroth</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:26:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;790,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;haha, bullshit, and you know it. You will be there the day the DVD launches. And you will fucking LIKE IT!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Captain Awesome</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:11:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257360</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Man, I've had enough TDK news to last me 10 years......   &lt;br&gt; I never thought I'd say this but I'm totally burned out on TDK,,,  I don't even care about the dvd anymore.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">790</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:52:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257359</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Errol&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Are you trying to prove how incredibly stupid you are?  Because, if so post no further, you've already succeeded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, don't DIRECTLY QUOTE ItsJustSomeRandomGuy's analysis of The Dark Knight and Iron Man and not cite him.  Those were his words, not yours.  You just come of sounding like an idiot when you make it seem like you were the one who came up with that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Iron Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:29:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why The Dark Knight will Beat Titanic</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/09/06/why-the-dark-knight-will-beat-titanic/#comment-11257358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yea, i agree with that one guy, errol your stupid.  without taking into account inflation, titanic sold more tickets than batman so more people actually went and saw titanic than batman.  that should determine which movie was actually more popular.  and please get a reality check, batman is not one of the top 20 films of all time.  you need to go and rent like a couple 100 movies and you'll see why, unless you really are that ignorant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and thats ridiculous to call titanic a fluke b/c so many people went back and saw it b/c it was truly an amazing feat in filmmaking.  there hasnt been a movie like titanic since where people kept going back to see it in large numbers.  only a few movies achieve that kind of repeat business after the first week, like star wars, gone with the wind, et, all classics that will be remembered like years from now.   and mind you, batman made 20% of its business the first weekend, where as titanic's first week was just a drop in the bucket.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">j</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:55:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>